Juror 4 is openly racist and prejudiced juror. However, jurors 7, 10 and 4 also show prejudiced opinions.
We can arrive at this answer because:
The defendant is a poor immigrant who lives in a marginalized region.
These characteristics should not be relevant in determining the man's guilt or innocence, but jurors 3 and 10 use them exaggeratedly to make their decision.
Jurors 3 and 10 make racist and xenophobic statements, presenting negative and harmful to all immigrants as if they all committed crimes.
They are not evaluating the evidence, but arriving at conclusions in a racist way.
Jurors 4 and 7 also make prejudiced statements, but this time, to poor people, who live in low-income regions.
"The 12 Angry Men," tells the story of a man who goes to trial accused of killing his father and is evaluated by 12 different jurors.
